15 PASSENGER VAN ROLLOVER ACCIDENT REPORT CONCERNING TWO DODGE CHURCH VANS IN TEXAS & NORTH CAROLINA
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD (NTSB)
15 PASSENGER CHURCH VAN ROLLOVERS IN QUESTION:
1993 Dodge 15-Passenger Van Rollover Accident (Single-Vehicle) - First Assembly of God Church, Henrietta, Texas, May 8, 2001 - (4 ejected, 4 Deaths & 8 Seriously Injured)
1989 Dodge Ram 15 Passenger Van Rollover - Virginia Heights Baptist Church of Roanoke, Virginia - Randleman, North Carolina, July 1, 2001- (4 ejected, 1 Death & 13 Injured)
This is a synopsis from the Safety Board's report and does not include the Board's rationale for the conclusions, probable cause, and safety recommendations. Safety Board staff is currently making final revisions to the report from which the attached conclusions and safety recommendations have been extracted. The final report and pertinent safety recommendation letters will be distributed to recommendation recipients as soon as possible. The attached information is subject to further review and editing.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On May 8, 2001, about 8:57 a.m., central daylight time, a 1993 Dodge 15-passenger van was eastbound on U.S. Route 82 near Henrietta, Texas, en route from Burkburnett, Texas, to an outlet mall in Gainesville, Texas. The driver and 11 passengers, all members of the First Assembly of God Church, occupied the van. As the vehicle approached milepost 538 in the left lane, at a calculated speed of 61 to 67 mph, the left rear tire experienced a tread separation and blowout; subsequently, the van departed the roadway and rolled over at least two times in the median, ejecting seven passengers before coming to final rest. The driver and three of the ejected passengers sustained fatal injuries, and eight passengers sustained serious injuries.
On July 1, 2001, about 2:30 p.m., eastern daylight time, a 1989 Dodge Ram 15-passenger van was northbound in the left lane on U.S. Route 220, near Randleman, North Carolina, en route from Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, to Roanoke, Virginia. The van, owned by Virginia Heights Baptist Church of Roanoke, Virginia, was occupied by the driver and 13 passengers, ages 13 to 19. As the vehicle approached the Level Cross, North Carolina, exit, at a witness-estimated speed of 65 mph, the left rear tire experienced a tread separation and blowout; subsequently, the van moved from the left lane into the right lane, then back into the left lane, where it overturned and came to rest in the travel lanes. During the accident sequence, four passengers were ejected, one of whom was fatally injured and three of whom sustained serious injuries; the driver and the other nine passengers sustained injuries ranging from none to serious.
The major safety issues discussed in this report are 15-passenger van classification, driver training, occupant protection, and tire condition, inspection, and maintenance.As a result of its investigation of these accidents, the Safety Board makes recommendations to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the 50 States and the District of Columbia, the American Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association, the American Automobile Association, the National Safety Council, the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and DaimlerChrysler Corporation.
CONCLUSIONS DRAWN CONCERNING 15 PASSENGER VAN ROLL OVERS
1. Following the tire blowouts, both accident drivers instinctively, but inappropriately, applied the brakes and over steered in an attempt to regain control of their vans; however, these actions led to further vehicle instability, resulting in loss of control and subsequent rollover.
2. There is no evidence of alcohol use, other drug use, or fatigue on the part of either driver. Weather and roadway conditions did not contribute to either the Henrietta, Texas, or Randleman, North Carolina, accidents and the emergency response to both was adequate.
3. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration�s and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration�s inadequate and inconsistent vehicle classification of 12- and 15-passenger vans leaves a gap that adversely affects regulations pertaining to the manufacture and safe operation of these vehicles.
4. Safe operation of 15-passenger vans requires a knowledge and skill level different from and above that for passenger vehicles, particularly when the vans are fully loaded or drivers experience an emergency situation.
5. During the rollover sequences in the Henrietta, Texas, and Randleman, North Carolina, accidents, passengers remaining inside the vehicles, as well as some ejected occupants, sustained injuries as a result of contact with interior surfaces, which were not required to be protected from occupant impact.
6. Had the passengers in the accident vans been wearing lap/shoulder belts, their injuries may have been less severe because of fewer and less forceful impacts with nonoccupant-protected interior components and other occupants and because those who were ejected would have remained in the vehicles.
7. The lap belt assemblies and anchorages in the center of the fourth row of both accident vans were configured in a manner that could increase the risk of injury to passengers in the event of an accident.
8. The roof crush to the Henrietta, Texas accident van contributed to the severity of the driver�s injuries and diminished survivable space for the passengers.
9. A combination of underinflation, degradation from weather, and, in the case of the Henrietta, Texas, van tire, a possible infiltration of air through a small puncture, is likely to have led to the rapid air loss and tread/belt separation on both the Henrietta, Texas, and the Randleman, North Carolina, left rear tires.
10. Because low tire pressure in fully loaded 15-passenger vans contributes to vehicle instability, the current tire pressure monitoring standard of 25 or 30 percent below manufacturer�s recommended pressure is insufficient to warn van drivers of potentially unsafe low pressures.
11. The Texas and Virginia safety inspection criteria, which do not adequately address tire pressure, overlook an important factor in vehicle safety inspection and that the Texas, Virginia, and American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators guidelines for vehicle safety inspections are not thorough enough because they exclude factors such as weather checking and tire rating.
PROBABLE CAUSE
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the accidents was tire failure, the drivers response to that failure, and the drivers inability to maintain control of their vans.Contributing to the accidents was the deteriorated condition of the tires, as a result of the churches lack of tire maintenance, and the handling characteristics of the van. Contributing to the severity of the injuries was the lack of appropriate Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards applicable to 15-passenger vans in the areas of restraints and occupant protection.
SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS
As a result of its investigation of the May 8, 2001 accident near Henrietta, Texas, and the July 1, 2001 accident near Randleman, North Carolina, the National Transportation Safety Board makes the following safety recommendations:
To the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration:
1. In cooperation with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, revise your definitions of buses and commercial motor vehicles to apply consistently to 12- and 15-passenger vans, taking into account the unique operating characteristics and multiple functions of these vans.
2. In cooperation with the American Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association, the National Safety Council, the American Automobile Association, General Motors Corporation and Ford Motor Company, develop a training program that incorporates the skills required for safe operation of 15-passenger vans and addresses the consequences of unsafe operation, including, but not limited to, operating in a fully loaded condition, emergency braking, high-speed lane changes, tire blowouts, and tire pressure and maintenance.
3. Include 15-passenger vans in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 201, Section 6, �Requirements for Upper Interior Component Protection.
4. Include 15-passenger vans in your upcoming rulemaking that will require lap/shoulder belts at all center seats.
5. Include 15-passenger vans in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 216, �Roof Crush Resistance, to minimize the extent to which survivable space is compromised in the event of a rollover accident.
6. In developing long-term performance requirements for tire pressure monitoring systems, adopt more stringent detection standards than 25 or 30 percent below manufacturer-recommended levels, since pressures at those levels can have an adverse effect on the handling of vehicles, such as 15-passenger vans.
To Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration:
7. In cooperation with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, revise your definitions of buses and commercial motor vehicles to apply consistently to 12- and 15-passenger vans, taking into account the unique operating characteristics and multiple functions of these vans.
To the 50 States and the District of Columbia:
8. Establish a drivers license endorsement for 15-passenger vans that adopts the standards established by the American Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association; to obtain the endorsement, drivers should have to complete a training program on the operation of 15-passenger vans and pass a written and skills test.
To Texas and Virginia:
9. Require that all passenger vehicle inspections include (1) tire pressure measurement and correction of any inflation deficiencies detected and (2) identification and failure of those tires that exhibit extensive weather checking and deterioration or that are not properly load-rated.
To the American Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association:
10. In cooperation with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the National Safety Council, the American Automobile Association, General Motors Corporation and Ford Motor Company, develop a training program that incorporates the skills required for safe operation of 15-passenger vans and addresses the consequences of unsafe operation, including, but not limited to, operating in a fully loaded condition, emergency braking, high-speed lane changes, tire blowouts, and tire pressure and maintenance.
To the American Automobile Association and the National Safety Council:
11. In cooperation with the American Driver and Traffic Safety Association, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and each other, develop a training program that incorporates the skills required for safe operation of 15-passenger vans and addresses the consequences of unsafe operation, including, but not limited to, operating in a fully loaded condition, emergency braking, high-speed lane changes, tire blowouts, and tire pressure and maintenance.
To American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators:
12. Revise your Passenger Vehicles and Light Trucks Inspection Handbook to provide guidance on inspecting and failing tires for extensive weather checking or deterioration and on examining tires to ensure that they have the proper load rating.
To Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation:
13. In cooperation with the American Driver and Traffic Safety Association, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the National Safety Council, the American Automobile Association, and each other, develop a training program that incorporates the skills required for safe operation of 15-passenger vans and addresses the consequences of unsafe operation, including, but not limited to, operating in a fully loaded condition, emergency braking, high-speed lane changes, tire blowouts, and tire pressure and maintenance.
14. Voluntarily develop and install technologies to provide upper interior component protection within 15-passenger vans by model year 2006.
15. Voluntarily install lap/shoulder belts at all center-seating positions in 15-passenger vans; make all lap/shoulder belts in outboard and center seating positions adjustable by model year 2006.
16. Redesign the seat belts in your 15-passenger vans to ensure that the buckle and latch components remain readily accessible to occupants at all times by model year 2006.
17. Voluntarily redesign 15-passenger vans to minimize the extent to which survivable space is compromised in the event of a rollover accident by model year 2006.
NTSB/HAR-03/03
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD
Public Meeting of July 15, 2003
Note: (Information is subject to further editing by NTSB)
15 PASSENGER VAN ROLLOVER ACCIDENT - ROOF COLLAPSE & SEATBELT DEFECTS LAWSUITS
If you or a member of your family has been involved in a 15 Passenger van roll over accident with severe roof crush, roof pillar collapse failure or any other serious accident or failure and you have questions about whether the vehicle or roof design, seatbelts, airbags or door locks / latches may caused or contributed to the accident or injuries, then call us now. Mr. Willis is a Board Certified Personal Injury Attorney with over 20+ years of product liability and rollover litigation experience.Call the Willis Law Firm at 1-800-883-9858 for a Free & Confidential Consultation or Click Here

PLEASE NOTE: The statements and information provided on this web site are for the informational purposes only. This law firm is not affiliated in any way with any trademark owner. The use of any trademarks on this site is for product identification and information purposes only .This webpage is provided to you to assist in SUV Rollover accidents, passenger van rollovers, 15 passenger van rollover accidents, recalls, truck accidents & rollovers, tire tread defects, tire separations, roof crush and roof pillar collapse, seat belt failures, fuel fed fires and other related rollover accident issues, including rollover injuries and deaths.This site is not intended to provide legal advice to the reader and NO attorney-client relationship shall be deemed to arise from the receipt this page and/or its associated pages or any oral or e-mail communication to or from with the Willis Law Firm. There will be NO lawsuits filed, claims made, letters or phone calls made for a prospective client, until that person is represented by the firm. An attorney client relationship only arises after the attorney and client have signed a written attorney client contract.
Mr. Willis is licensed attorney in New York and Texas. He is a Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Lawyer, certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. Read more about Board Certification, Click Here. Principle office is Houston, Texas.
Mr. Willis has represented clients in personal injury, auto accident, suv rollover, van & truck rollovers and other product liability and negligence cases from across the United States, including clients from Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin & West Virginia.
Further, any statement or reference to past personal injury, products liability or SUV rollover lawsuits, settlements or verdicts should NOT be relied upon in one's own case or in your decision on which law firm to hire. All client's cases, facts, injuries, damages, venues and lawsuits are different and there is NO way to predict the outcome of a particular case, verdict of a jury or judge or the strength of a case before a judge, jury or the appellate court system. The client is responsible for all of their own medical expenses. All cases are handled on a contingent fee basis. NO attorneys fees or case costs charged to client, unless a recovery is made for the client. Often in very serious and catastrophic injury and death cases Mr. Willis may associate with another products liability attorney as co-counsel and in other matters, the case may be referred. In cases where a legal matter is referred, Mr. Willis will continue to maintain joint responsibility with the handling attorney or lead counsel and actively monitor the progress and development of the case. Due to his 22+ years of experience in personal injury and products liability cases, Mr. Willis will often continue to assist in working with the hired experts and engineers and in research of the defective product or other related legal matters in the case.

|